![]() ![]() The median duration of non-invasive respiratory support was not significantly different between the two groups (21 h for nHFOV vs 15 h for nCPAP p = 0.09). Thirty of these infants were included in the nHFOV group and 30 were included in the nCPAP group. A total of 60 infants were included in the study. Infants who met treatment failure criteria were switched to nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation for further positive-pressure support. Treatment was started with standard settings in both groups. The infants were randomly assigned to receive either nHFOV or nCPAP. ![]() Late preterm and term infants > 34 weeks’ gestation were included in the study. This prospective randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of nHFOV and nCPAP in reducing the duration of non-invasive respiratory support. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) is a non-invasive respiratory support mode that has been increasingly used in neonatal respiratory disorders. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is one of the most commonly used non-invasive respiratory support modes in neonates with transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |